Court Filing Tracker

Litigation Monitor

Federal court & PTAB docket tracking

Automated monitoring of federal district court, Federal Circuit appeals, and PTAB inter partes review proceedings.

CourtListener Feed Active Cases
Live • Updated: --
8
Total Matters
4
Court Cases
4
PTAB IPRs
09/22/26
Most Recent
Federal Court Proceedings

Court Dockets

APA Action District Court
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
Case No. 1:26-cv-03318-UNA

Carter v. Feinberg

DAITONA CARTER, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN A. FEINBERG (Deputy Secretary of Defense) and PETE HEGSETH. Administrative Procedure Act challenge. Doc. 3 filed 09/22/26.

⚠ Cover Sheet Code Error Filed as Code 550 (Incorrect) Should be Code 899 - Administrative Procedure Act/Review (Correct) This is an administrative filing error on the civil cover sheet. Does not affect case substance.
Active
Download Complaint (DOC 1) Download DOC 3
Patent Appeal Federal Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Appeal No. 26-1721

Solos Technology Ltd. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Daitona Carter, Movant-Appellant Pro Se v. META PLATFORMS, INC., OAKLEY, INC., LUXOTTICA. Appeal from D. Mass. 1:26-cv-1034-ADB. Reply brief filed 08/20/26.

Under Review
Download Initial Filing
Emergency Petition Federal Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Misc. Docket No. 26-153

In re: Carter

Emergency Notice of Subsequent Multi-Forum Factual Developments. Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus under 28 U.S.C. Filed 08/24-08/26/26.

Pending
Download Emergency Petition
Petition Federal Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Misc. Docket No. 26-136

In re: Carter

Federal Circuit matter involving patent/technology litigation oversight. Related to Solos Technology v. Meta proceedings.

Closed
Download Filed Documents
Patent Trials & Appeal Board

Related IPR Proceedings

Inter partes review petitions filed patents related to smart glasses technology. Carter is currently considered a Non-Party. However, Carter's USPTO Petition to the Director regarding RPI and Related Matters are reflected on multiple IPRs.

IPR Proceeding PTAB
United States Patent & Trademark Office
IPR2026-00376

Luxottica of America, Inc. v. Solos Technology Ltd.

Challenge to U.S. Patent No. 12,216,339 ('339 Patent). Filed 06/18/2026. Related to smart eyewear technology claims.

⚠ PTAB IPR: Non-Party Email on Docket Per USPTO rules, IPR proceedings should not include non-party email addresses on public docket. Docket records show email notification addresses registered via petition. This is a procedural irregularity in PTAB noticing system. Carter's petition to USPTO resulted in email addresses appearing on the docket despite non-party status restrictions.
Pending
View PTAB Docket
IPR Proceeding PTAB
United States Patent & Trademark Office
IPR2026-00412

Meta Platforms Inc. v. Solos Technology Ltd.

Challenge targeting digital microphone array patent. Claims challenged over Moquin, Liu & Andersen prior art for oversampled-domain delay obviousness.

⚠ PTAB IPR: Non-Party Email on Docket Per USPTO rules, IPR proceedings should not include non-party email addresses on public docket. Docket records show email notification addresses registered via petition. This is a procedural irregularity in PTAB noticing system. Carter's petition to USPTO resulted in email addresses appearing on the docket despite non-party status restrictions.
Pending
View PTAB Docket
IPR Proceeding PTAB
United States Patent & Trademark Office
IPR2026-00413

Meta Platforms Inc. v. Solos Technology Ltd.

Challenge to U.S. Patent No. 11,871,174 ('174 Patent). All 28 claims targeted as obvious over prior art combining speaker cavities with sound reflectors.

Pending
View PTAB Docket
IPR Proceeding PTAB
United States Patent & Trademark Office
IPR2026-00420

Meta Platforms Inc. v. Solos Technology Ltd.

Challenge to microphone array beamforming patent. 20 claims targeted over Adams/Nguyen prior art for digital signal delay obviousness.

⚠ PTAB IPR: Non-Party Email on Docket Per USPTO rules, IPR proceedings should not include non-party email addresses on public docket. Docket records show email notification addresses registered via petition. This is a procedural irregularity in PTAB noticing system. Carter's petition to USPTO resulted in email addresses appearing on the docket despite non-party status restrictions.
Pending
View PTAB Docket
Data Sources

CourtListener RSS feed:

https://www.courtlistener.com/feed/search/?q=daitona+carter&type=r&order_by=score+desc

PTAB filings sourced from USPTO Public PAIR and USPTO Open Data Portal.